TE
TechEcho
StartseiteTop 24hNeuesteBesteFragenZeigenJobs
GitHubTwitter
Startseite

TechEcho

Eine mit Next.js erstellte Technologie-Nachrichtenplattform, die globale Technologienachrichten und Diskussionen bietet.

GitHubTwitter

Startseite

StartseiteNeuesteBesteFragenZeigenJobs

Ressourcen

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Comparing Docusaurus and Starlight and why we made the switch

58 Punktevon pmigvor 8 Tagen

6 comments

suryaovor 4 Tagen
For writing technical styled documentation, I&#x27;ve found fumadocs to be amazing.<p>It looks great out of the box and supports a product switcher, which can be used for maintaining related products or product versions. It also supports OpenAPI imports and API playgrounds.<p>The best part is that it is just a fully fledged (nextjs) app that is entirely customizable with relative ease. We just moved to it from Docusaurus and couldn&#x27;t be happier.
评论 #44130482 未加载
quintu5vor 4 Tagen
Regarding the author’s mention of starlight missing support for mermaid — shouldn’t they be able to just use mermaidjs to render those charts? Why the need for playwright or a plugin?
MrDarcyvor 4 Tagen
For documentation versioned docs are critical. Docusaurus handles multiple versions extremely well, curious if the author has released a new major version of Glasskube and if not, will they miss this feature in the future.
评论 #44110207 未加载
swyxvor 1 Tag
&gt; To be completely honest: The reason I looked for another documentation framework was that I was fed up with Docusaurus taking forever to start the initial development server. With the latest Node version (24), Docusaurus version (3.7), and React version (19), it took a little over 5 seconds to start the development server. Although this number doesn&#x27;t seem to be that high, it was a lot higher with previous versions. I remember waiting over 20 seconds for the development server to start, which really frustrated me.<p>what is the cause for this?
rxliulivor 3 Tagen
I haven&#x27;t used Starlight, but Docusaurus is very slow. The last time I used it, its performance on a large documentation site was terrible, even causing the GitHub Actions Runner to time out. In other words, a single build took over 30 minutes. I never considered using it again after that.
willwadevor 4 Tagen
Particularly like the honest take. I wouldn’t say reading this I’d go for starlight either<p>&gt; When I tried to create marketing pages with Starlight in addition to the technical documentation, I nearly gave up. Coming from the Docusaurus world, this wasn&#x27;t an issue as the starter template comes with a front page and a blog out of the box. You can even create multiple documentations on different paths. We used &#x2F;docs, for example.<p>&gt; Starlight, on the other hand, is only built for documentation and not for marketing pages. It even took an ugly hack to make sure the default path is &#x2F;docs and not &#x2F;.<p>&gt; Please don&#x27;t look at this custom script configured in our astro.config.mjs we need to execute on every page to make sure that the redirection works properly<p>Love the straight talking. Refreshing in the period of ai slop blogposts
评论 #44110135 未加载
评论 #44110988 未加载