I'd take it with a grain of salt.<p><pre><code> - Benchmarks are only for Safari and without good documentation for how they
were performed. Measurements are only in the 100ths of seconds where these
measurements should have much more granularity.
- The TodoMVC (arguably the most real-world) benchmark is nearly 50% slower
than virtual-DOM.
- virtual-DOM is fairly mature at this point where as MorphDOM looks very
young.
- virtual DOM implementations allow you to do things like React Native</code></pre>
This sounds very similar to <a href="http://google.github.io/incremental-dom/#about" rel="nofollow">http://google.github.io/incremental-dom/#about</a> (esp skipping the virtual part).<p>Can anyone point out any notable differences?
The virtual dom solutions can run outside, without a <i>full</i> DOM implementation, which are very slow and resource intensive on a server. Which is needed for client+server-side rendering options.
Currently using virtual-dom to power my front-end system, but have been waiting for something like this. Can't wait to see how it works in comparison.