TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Announcing Lower, Simpler Pricing

47 pointsby mikexstudiosover 9 years ago

10 comments

Eridrusover 9 years ago
I spent a little bit of time examining different options in this space a few weeks back, I found these options:<p>Firebase<p>Couchbase Mobile Sync Gateway<p>CouchDB<p>PouchDB<p>Amazon Cognito<p>Azure Mobile Data Sync<p>Cloudant<p>My main issues with Firebase (in order of importance) were:<p>a) Uncontrollable sync. It seems to always use a web sockets&#x2F;long poll, and count how many connections you have. Which is not appropriate when data changes infrequently and you&#x27;re concerned about your users battery life. Mainly, I wanted to be able to do push using GCM&#x2F;etc.<p>b) Single unmodifiable conflict resolution strategy<p>c) SaaS-only<p>It seems very polished and easy to get started with, but since there was no upgrade path to anything else, the fact that it really wasn&#x27;t a good fit for my sync needs made it seem like a bad option.<p>I&#x27;m not a huge fan of these systems in general since they have you connecting to a dedicated database that you plug code into (eg as a sync function), rather than exposing building blocks for you to build a sync service.<p>But I&#x27;m still using pouchdb on the client for the moment, and I haven&#x27;t fully figured out what the backend will be, but at least I have a few options in pouchdb-server&#x2F;couchbase&#x2F;couchdb&#x2F;cloudant.
评论 #10088446 未加载
评论 #10088417 未加载
评论 #10089067 未加载
评论 #10088365 未加载
chrisfosterelliover 9 years ago
In my opinion this makes Firebase <i>way</i> more approachable. Previously, their limited number of connections made it very, very expensive very quickly. Storage seems like a much more logical scaling factor.
jenkinsjover 9 years ago
I&#x27;m glad there is a simple $5 plan. This makes hacking on my small project (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fireform.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fireform.org&#x2F;</a> - plug) a much more reasonable proposition.
评论 #10088420 未加载
listicover 9 years ago
What is the actual difference between the Free ($0) and Spark ($5&#x2F;mo.) plans? I see the difference in custom domain, but it hardly matters with a backend service like Firebase, doesn&#x27;t it?
评论 #10088299 未加载
评论 #10088286 未加载
buckbovaover 9 years ago
I just got this email too.<p>Price jumps from 5 bucks to 50. Still too pricey for me.<p>I did explore what they have to offer and it is fairly extensive. I&#x27;m not sure about performance though. I did not test that.
评论 #10088439 未加载
mozumderover 9 years ago
Are they worried about competition from Apple&#x27;s CoreData, which Apple developers get as part of their registration?
评论 #10088231 未加载
评论 #10088235 未加载
rco8786over 9 years ago
What&#x27;s the difference between the free plan and the $5 plan? They look exactly the same, unless I&#x27;m blind.
评论 #10088279 未加载
评论 #10088277 未加载
评论 #10088274 未加载
teenover 9 years ago
if only firebase could scale... they have so much downtime
评论 #10088316 未加载
评论 #10088265 未加载
syncover 9 years ago
Summary of what&#x27;s changed is available on their blog: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.firebase.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2015-08-19-announcing-lower-simpler-pricing.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.firebase.com&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2015-08-19-announcing-lower-si...</a>
评论 #10088271 未加载
CyberDildonicsover 9 years ago
Come on guys, this ad isn&#x27;t even disguised as a wired article.