TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

NeXTBSD aka FreeBSD X

154 pointsby tachionover 9 years ago

13 comments

gh02tover 9 years ago
Any idea what the purpose is to this? I'm not putting it down, I'm just looking for context. The annotations say this work is being done at iXsystems, best known for being the stewards of FreeNAS, but this project seems to be separate.
评论 #10126353 未加载
hoistorover 9 years ago
Disappointing really, but I think it&#x27;s unlikely to make it upstream. Perhaps I&#x27;ve missed some of the advantages to taking this approach though.. Or .. any of them?<p>I&#x27;d be completely onboard with SMF replacing the init system on all my fbsd boxes though (I have many on bare metal with linux under bhyve for various things that need it).<p>I don&#x27;t think that&#x27;s an easy port though with the contract system etc solaris had for process accounting.<p>Ahhh. I miss solaris. FreeBSD is almost where we were feature wise before oracle killed it (zfs, dtrace, jails(iocage) etc).
评论 #10127599 未加载
cpetersoover 9 years ago
FreeBSD + Mach kernel, libdispatch, and launchd? How does this differ from Darwin?
评论 #10126013 未加载
评论 #10126140 未加载
webaholicover 9 years ago
I wish they would outline their plans to integrate these technologies with FreeBSD. It is time for Apple (by way of their innovations) to feed the base which they used to build Mac OS X. How willing is the FreeBSD upstream to integrate these?
评论 #10126674 未加载
bnasticover 9 years ago
Jordan Hubbard mentions some of his reasoning behind going back to what he did at Apple (among other things) in this thread: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.freebsd.org&#x2F;pipermail&#x2F;freebsd-hackers&#x2F;2015-August&#x2F;048090.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lists.freebsd.org&#x2F;pipermail&#x2F;freebsd-hackers&#x2F;2015-Aug...</a>
评论 #10129258 未加载
kev009over 9 years ago
As a FreeBSD user, developer, and fan, I&#x27;m excited that they are digging into some of this stuff. My amateur question is just wonder if adding a ton of new KPIs is really necessary, or could be done in a more holistic thinking way.
bbathaover 9 years ago
I wonder if you could glue microsoft&#x27;s ios emulation layer on top of this and get the basis of an open source ios&#x2F;os x?
评论 #10126215 未加载
评论 #10126112 未加载
sergiolpover 9 years ago
A curious (and probably unintended) side effect, is that if its implementation of the Mach API is complete enough, this should allow to run Hurd user space server&#x2F;translators on FreeBSD.<p>Not sure if useful, but would be cool (in a weird, nerdy way) anyway.
评论 #10129741 未加载
gjvcover 9 years ago
where &#x2F; when was this presented?
评论 #10125813 未加载
michaelpintoover 9 years ago
Dumb question: Could this give me a NeXT desktop in VMware? And could it run old NeXTstep software?
评论 #10127997 未加载
fithisuxover 9 years ago
Freebsd X will have ioKit drivers? (source compatibility)
ilurkedhereover 9 years ago
Is this similar to systemd?
评论 #10126979 未加载
评论 #10127768 未加载
评论 #10126919 未加载
评论 #10128654 未加载
felixgalloover 9 years ago
&quot;launchd clubs UNIX&#x27;s &#x27;keep it simple&#x27; philosophy like a baby harp seal&#x27;...Hint: the world has changed!&quot;<p>Yeah -- Unix completely dominated essentially every market niche, utterly annihilating all competing philosophies so hard you&#x27;d think it was drilling for oil.
评论 #10127054 未加载