TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of Splittable Pseudo-Random Generators [pdf]

14 pointsby jcrover 9 years ago

1 comment

iskanderover 9 years ago
Probably the most important result:<p>&gt;There is one S-PRNG construction where we have not been able to find any fault, namely the hash based generator of Claessen and Pałka (2013a). In particular, the generator was subject to the test methodology described in Sections 5.5–5.6, passing all tests.<p>Does anyone know if splittable PRNGs are equivalent to the class of PRNG you could implement with a parallel prefix scan?