TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Amazon EC2 Container Registry

119 pointsby pzbover 9 years ago

10 comments

csomarover 9 years ago
This is really much needed (if they did it right). The container registry @ docker is terribly broken and the user experience is frustrating. I ended up using Git repositories + building on server because it was &quot;so unusable&quot;.<p>Hopefully, this changes things.
评论 #10354159 未加载
评论 #10354354 未加载
评论 #10357052 未加载
jbedaover 9 years ago
If you want to use a reasonably priced non-Docker-run registry that is available today, check out the Google Container Registry: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;container-registry&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;container-registry&#x2F;</a><p>It recently hit GA and is super fast. You can use it from anywhere -- not just GCE.<p>(Disclaimer: I used to work at Google on GCE&#x2F;GKE&#x2F;Kubernetes).
评论 #10355458 未加载
评论 #10354122 未加载
andrewstuart2over 9 years ago
This is definitely a great move for Amazon. As it is now, the docker registry is ridiculously difficult to get set up and secured.<p>That said, I find myself wishing that Amazon would contribute more back to the Docker project (specifically the registry in this case), and then provide a hosted option with IAM integration, etc.<p>The existing AWS ecosystem is already enough for me to want to stay with them, but I&#x27;d say the Docker ecosystem is fragile enough that it could use some bolstering just to keep it viable and ensure Amazon&#x27;s investments don&#x27;t go down the tube if something better comes along.
评论 #10354304 未加载
评论 #10354106 未加载
knodi123over 9 years ago
Can anyone comment on how this compares to <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;quay.io" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;quay.io</a>? We use that, and I&#x27;m less than impressed.
评论 #10359092 未加载
评论 #10355350 未加载
评论 #10355416 未加载
评论 #10355347 未加载
mthenwover 9 years ago
Short price comparison:<p>AWS ECR: $0.10&#x2F;GB-month (+ data transfer)<p>quay.io: $12&#x2F;month - cheapest plan (5 repos)<p>docker.com: $7&#x2F;month - cheapest plan (5 repos)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aws.amazon.com&#x2F;ecr&#x2F;pricing&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;aws.amazon.com&#x2F;ecr&#x2F;pricing&#x2F;</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quay.io&#x2F;plans&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;quay.io&#x2F;plans&#x2F;</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.docker.com&#x2F;pricing" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.docker.com&#x2F;pricing</a>
datadataover 9 years ago
Self hosting a registry (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hub.docker.com&#x2F;_&#x2F;registry&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hub.docker.com&#x2F;_&#x2F;registry&#x2F;</a>) on aws backed by s3 storage is fairly easy and is already available today.
评论 #10357060 未加载
评论 #10354573 未加载
pbreitover 9 years ago
Is this a blow to Docker the company? Probably not unexpected?
评论 #10354072 未加载
jfindleyover 9 years ago
What I&#x27;d really like is an all-in-one service that incorporated Docker Content Trust[0]. While I&#x27;d prefer that they&#x27;d used something a bit more mainstream (e.g. GPG), some image signing is better than none at all.<p>Doing this today requires a fair bit of extra infrastructure over a basic v2 registry, and really it&#x27;d be much nicer to have a single service that was able to manage this.<p>0: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.docker.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;08&#x2F;content-trust-docker-1-8&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.docker.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;08&#x2F;content-trust-docker-1-8&#x2F;</a>
评论 #10357006 未加载
kinover 9 years ago
These past two days has been a crazy barrage of Amazon products. Way to ship, especially after all the hard work articles about them recently.
评论 #10354352 未加载
zaczacover 9 years ago
too many Amazon cloud news.