And this is why some people shouldn't even have flagging rights I think.<p>Now this story is off the front page and lost for the majority of the audience here.
Seems hugged to death already, sorry.<p>Wayback machine link:<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20151008102734/http://www.preining.info/blog/2015/10/looking-at-the-facts-sarah-sharps-crusade/" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20151008102734/http://www.preinin...</a>
"Social Justice Warrior"<p>Really? That's the level of discourse the author is gonna set the bar at? At least I know that I'm not missing any substance by having just skimmed the post.<p>Seems like a cheap scramble for pageviews with an incredibly biased article, starting with the title.
"crusade", "SJW mode", "ranting", "meandering", "here [sic] arguments are so weak I had nothing but good laugh" and it goes on and on.<p>The author couldn't be less objective and unprejudiced, if he tried. Obviously though he doesn't and couldn't give less of a fuck, not even remotely making an attempt at actually merely "Looking at the facts".<p>No matter where your opinion on Sarah Sharp, this piece makes one thing abundantly clear, the author is an asshole. Which I'm sure he doesn't mind being called, I mean this is all just fun right?