I don't understand why these specifications:<p>* <i>Does not log anything about visitors. (A+1)</i><p>* <i>Follows the criteria in The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s best practices for online service providers. (A+2)</i><p>* <i>Follows the Web “Content” Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0) standard. (A+3)</i><p>* <i>Follows the Web Accessibility Initiative — Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.0 (WAI-ARIA 1.0) standard. (A+4)</i><p>.<p>... are considered less essential than these:<p>* <i>Says “free software,” not “open source.” (A6)</i><p>* <i>Clearly endorses the Free Software Movement's ideas of freedom. (A7)</i><p>* <i>Avoids saying “Linux” without “GNU” when referring to GNU/Linux. (A8)</i><p>.<p>Is privacy and accessibility really less important than GNU's branding?