I'll happily agree to sign away my first-born. First because you can't sign away what you don't have, and second because such a clause would be void where I live (Germany). Yay customer protection laws!
Me and friend (he was a contract attorney) started a company that read and published the fine print of various products (many of it was software and smartphone contracts and EULA's) and tried to warn consumers what they were signing off on.<p>We didn't get far because after a year, it was clear nobody cared what was in the EULA's they were signing even if it meant giving up your personal information. They were more concerned with the ability to use a new piece of hardware or software they thought was cool without thinking about the ramifications of giving out so much personal information to do so.<p>It was eye opening to say the least.
This reminded me of Richard Dreyfuss' dramatic readings of the iTunes EULA: [1]<p>[1] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu0lqUlHEko" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu0lqUlHEko</a>
My product has an EULA less than 200 words so I feel I'm not being too awful. About half of it is just there because of the requirements of the licences of all the libraries it uses. No reverse engineering - really? I don't care but Intel does and I'm using their library. Can't freely distribute? I don't care but the LGPL and MIT licences do so I have to put it in my EULA.