>SEC. 6. JUDICIAL REVIEW AND ENFORCEABILITY.<p>>(a) JUDICIAL REVIEW.—There shall be no judicial review of compliance or noncompliance with any provision of this Act.<p>>(b) ENFORCEABILITY.—No provision of this Act shall be construed to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable by any administrative or judicial action.<p>I'm not particularly familiar with the intricacies of self-regulation in the US government; if judges can't review whether an agency is following the rule, and individuals don't have grounds to force the matter because it's not a "right or benefit", does this mean that there's no enforceability at all, or is there some other mechanism not mentioned here that kicks in by default?
This is funny and ironic, but really it's no different than implementing Lisp in C. Naturally, the implementation language will not be as nice as the implemented language.
We also need a bill length vs. review time rule.<p>If a law is too long for a representative to have read it (Patriot act, ACA) then Congress should not vote on it until they've had enough time to read it.<p>I propose 10 days + (number of pages / 5) after it's been introduced to the public.
The way some governmental texts are written, I wouldn't be surprised if they run the original text through an obfuscation find/replace algorithm that replaces words <5 letters with a similar word from a thesaurus with the maximum length available.