TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

How We Moved 34k Wired Pages to One Site

56 pointsby nolsover 9 years ago

8 comments

teddyhover 9 years ago
When the Wayback Machine does a better job than you do in preserving your content, you have failed.<p>I looked through some old bookmarks, and I couldn’t even <i>find</i> these articles on the new site:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20090220095241&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;culture&#x2F;lifestyle&#x2F;news&#x2F;2000&#x2F;03&#x2F;35143" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20090220095241&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.c...</a><p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.wired.com&#x2F;politics&#x2F;security&#x2F;commentary&#x2F;securitymatters&#x2F;2006&#x2F;05&#x2F;70886" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.wired.com&#x2F;politics&#x2F;security&#x2F;commentary&#x2F;securi...</a>
kyle6884over 9 years ago
Might be a good idea to put a canonical tag on the old to the new content.<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.wired.com&#x2F;wired&#x2F;archive&#x2F;1.02&#x2F;crypto.rebels_pr.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.wired.com&#x2F;wired&#x2F;archive&#x2F;1.02&#x2F;crypto.rebels_pr...</a> &gt; <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;1993&#x2F;02&#x2F;crypto-rebels&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;1993&#x2F;02&#x2F;crypto-rebels&#x2F;</a>
评论 #10480739 未加载
评论 #10480820 未加载
carbocationover 9 years ago
&gt; How We Moved 34,000 WIRED Pages to One Site in 9 Hours<p>&gt; Starting in April, Cyphon quickly consumed most of my working hours.<p>This juxtaposition either emphasizes the fantastically few hours worked (9 hours since April!) or the slight exaggeration about moving 34k pages in 9 hours.
评论 #10481067 未加载
aaronbrethorstover 9 years ago
<p><pre><code> While they serve as an interesting historic record of digital trends, they lack the read- ability and reusability of our current site. </code></pre> Yeah, especially those super-readable headlines on the new site.
评论 #10480727 未加载
pgroteover 9 years ago
Odd. There are no redirects for the old articles to the new ones.<p>For instance, this example:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;1999&#x2F;07&#x2F;pilgrims&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;1999&#x2F;07&#x2F;pilgrims&#x2F;</a><p>Originally showed up here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.wired.com&#x2F;wired&#x2F;archive&#x2F;7.07&#x2F;pilgrims_pr.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.wired.com&#x2F;wired&#x2F;archive&#x2F;7.07&#x2F;pilgrims_pr.htm...</a><p>It doesn&#x27;t redirect.
efnresidentover 9 years ago
Pleasantly surprised by this post. Interesting project that could be applied to other archived publications.
评论 #10480724 未加载
gamesbrainiacover 9 years ago
Am I missing something here, and I&#x27;m not trying to be snarky, but how is this a big deal?
anon5_over 9 years ago
You guys were hardly successful - I still go through 27bstroke6 (yes, i remember the old name of threatlevel) and find the PDF affidavits are broken links.<p>Disappointing guys. Do you care enough? Can you guys hire and intern, go back into pacer and bring back the PDF&#x27;s?<p>Make a log of your progress please. Do that, and you&#x27;ll win my respect. Poulsen&#x27;s writing was great.