TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Devaluation of Music

3 pointsby grouchysmurfover 9 years ago

1 comment

Nadyaover 9 years ago
<i>&gt;and streaming royalties</i><p>Stopping the author here. Streaming royalties are fine. Labels keeping 80% of those streaming royalties due to exploitative record deals is the problem. Furthermore, playing live gigs and selling merchandise has <i>always</i> been how artists earn their money unless they&#x27;re one of the superstar artists who are too big for the label to let go.<p>Streaming services pay more than radio and have better statistics to track how many people actually heard&#x2F;listened to the song. Streaming services can help promote CD sales or influence merchandise sales.<p>Furthermore - I&#x27;d place a large wager that streaming has <i>lessened</i> piracy. It has made music easier to obtain and listen to on-demand and you don&#x27;t need to go to some shady site (for those unaware of private trackers, which is most people) to download the album.<p>#1) Few people ever cared.<p><i>&gt;maven class that infuses the culture with informed enthusiasm</i><p>To most people, this is a nice way of saying &quot;pretentious asshole who won&#x27;t shut up that they can name any minor detail about an album&quot;.<p>#2) I can agree with this point. But the value of radio in general has gone down with on-demand&#x2F;XM, being able to play an iPod in the car, etc. Why do I need a radio station to help me find new music when I can use Spotify&#x27;s &quot;similar to [___]&quot; feature?<p>#3) This is a problem with media as a whole. For most places it&#x27;s about views, clicks, and ad impressions now and that means trendy&#x2F;viral&#x2F;pop. Not covering some obscure up-and-coming Jazz artist.<p>#4) No. That&#x27;s because of hipsters and music snobs who believe in special copper wiring. This seems to be a case for analog vs digital ; because there are music players that aren&#x27;t <i>media</i> players. They&#x27;re just less popular because people would rather have a program that does both.<p>#5) Look harder. I like the picture of ICP. Staying in the same genre, would you say Aesop Rock is anti-intellectual? The thing is people listen to music for entertainment. Not to think critically about things or have to decode metaphors to understand what is being said.<p>#6) I didn&#x27;t follow the point being made.<p>#7) Citation needed. I&#x27;ve always been huge on music, I avoid concerts at all costs. Also define &quot;serious&quot; concerts. Do you mean classical? Methinks the author has a huge Jazz&#x2F;Classical bias here.<p>Closing paragraphs: Define &quot;serious music&quot;. I&#x27;m thinking you mean Jazz&#x2F;Classical?<p><i>&gt;Complex instrumental music has become marginalized to within an inch of its very existence</i><p>That&#x27;s because most people find it boring. Next you&#x27;ll be telling me people are reading less!