The press release seems significantly better, includes the abstract of the papers, links to full texts, and isn't behind a paywall:
<a href="https://news.ncsu.edu/2015/11/narayan-q-carbon-2015/" rel="nofollow">https://news.ncsu.edu/2015/11/narayan-q-carbon-2015/</a>
In case you want to see the original paper: <a href="http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jap/118/21/10.1063/1.4936595" rel="nofollow">http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jap/118/21/10.1...</a>
Promising but this looks too good to be true. Most of the articles I can find are regurgitations of the press release. Anyone find anything with an independent take?
"[R]esearchers say" this, "researchers say" that... Why not do real reporting, and write a real article, which has verified facts, and doesn't need weasel phrases?