TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

AMD's Answer to GameWorks: Open Source Tools, Graphics FX, Libraries and SDKs

164 pointsby altern8over 9 years ago

9 comments

herbstover 9 years ago
Thats exactly why i buy AMD cards over Nvidia again and again. Who cares about super fancy graphics and yet another, 2% faster shader. Want i want is properly supported Hardware with working Open Source drivers from a company that has interest in its users hacking their own solutions, even when they get better than their properitary ones.
评论 #10744515 未加载
评论 #10744107 未加载
评论 #10744121 未加载
评论 #10745566 未加载
评论 #10745335 未加载
sevensorover 9 years ago
Sometimes, the free market does something that really impresses me. This is one of those times. Here we have AMD releasing open source tools in an attempt to beat a competitor whose hardware is technically superior. Sure, this seems like a desparate measure from a company that's lost its way and will try anything to make a buck. And it's probably motivated by a desire to generate lock-in for their hardware. But that's capitalism!
评论 #10747270 未加载
autobahnover 9 years ago
AMD also released FreeSync, an open alternative to Gsync, a dynamic refresh-rate interface for monitors. The Nvidia version requires nvidia hardware and licensing and adds significant cost to the monitor, whereas freesync can be implemented in the control boards that already exist for the monitors, and without cost.<p>I think they&#x27;re both great graphics cards, but NVidia tries its best to stifle competition.
评论 #10750269 未加载
rasz_plover 9 years ago
AMD is very badly mismanaged. Ever since K8 engineering is again perceived as a source of cost. They lost $400mil on failed ARM servers idea without blinking an eye, but plain refuse to fund proper software support for their products because that would cost like 30-40 engineer salaries! :(.<p>AMD is Commodore of this decade.
Diwotoover 9 years ago
I&#x27;m all for AMD going open source with these tools (I love the fact they&#x27;re doing this) but the reason that developers go with GameWorks in the first place is because Nvidia is able to allocate staff&#x2F;resources to the game studios to assist in implementing.
评论 #10748145 未加载
taspeotisover 9 years ago
Last time I checked AMD was losing something like $200MM a quarter with around $750MM cash on hand. So they could be out of money in a year.<p>NVIDIA isn&#x27;t exactly losing this race ... why not just lock yourself in to GameWorks?
评论 #10743896 未加载
评论 #10743858 未加载
评论 #10745512 未加载
评论 #10743882 未加载
oxideover 9 years ago
AMD has consistently impressed me with stuff like this, definitely going AMD this time when it&#x27;s time to upgrade the ol&#x27; GPU. Nvidia be damned.
singularity2001over 9 years ago
They better get into deep learning territory quicker!
omarshaikhover 9 years ago
Looks like another attempt at grabbing a share from NVidia&#x27;s CUDA ecosystem... Not gonna happen.