I really like the new setup. It's much less confusing than it was before.<p>I've used it every few days since you first announced it here - it's pretty fun to play around with.<p>I don't know how feasible it is to do this, but instead of prefix and suffix, I would <i>really</i> like to be able to use wildcards in my search. For example, say I'm looking for a domain that starts with the word "dog" and ends with "cat" or "cats"; I would like to be able to search "dog*cat?" instead of 2 boxes over 2 searches (one for the "cat" suffix and one for the "cats" suffix).
It looks like there is a bug when using the prefix and suffix fields together.<p>Entered "ns" in the prefix field and saw a bunch of domains. Added "ing" to the suffix field and nothing showed up. I figured the site was just slow until I realized that it wasn't going to refresh.<p>Cleared "ing" and typed "g" in the suffix field. Showed results. Then added an "n" just before the "g" to get "ng". Less results than before as expected. Then added an "i" just before the "ng" to get "ing".<p>That gave me a list of domains starting with "ns" and ending in "ing".<p>(Using Firefox 3.5.7 if that matters)
Spectacular, and FAST!<p>One <i>small</i> note, from my experience: it wasn't immediately obvious that results would appear right away, partly because of the drop down and submit button at the bottom.
Was yours the site with the numbers to weight the score along the top for each column? As a geek, I far preferred that because I had more control. As someone looking at this with the eye of your average user, this system is better. A bit like comparing vi and Textmate, I guess.
Great project, congratulations.<p>I am still curious about one aspect: why do you realease the source code? (same question for browsershots).. I think for such a service the vast majority is not interested in the backend code and those who are interested might take it and build a competing product, not being required to release the modified code. Am I missing something? What is your take on this ?
It's very awesome.<p>One thing that would be very cool... is regex support? :D<p>But barring that, a "contains" box. I.e. if I don't care if the website starts with cat or ends with cat, as long as cat is in there somewhere.
I really like it, really simple to use and fast like other people said. In fact, I found a great name related to my main project that I'm going to snap up.<p>The first time around though, I didn't notice that I could pick my preferred registrar at the bottom to get you the referral. Maybe that should default to empty and ask your preferred registrar on a domain click if it's blank? Just a thought.
Maybe I'm not understanding how it should work, but I'm not getting a lot of results. For example try to enter something crazy / random in the beginning, like "kqxj" you get no results. Even for something like ending in "hedule" (since there seems to be a bug if you type in more than 5 characters) only a few entries are shown for domains that end in "schedule"... It's pretty fast though.
Love the simplicity and quality of the site. I like the "How can we improve this page" everywhere. It is nice to see a constant message of trying to improve and making it drop dead simple to send feedback.<p>Above all though, the speed of the lookups is impressive. So many other tools are slow and clunky.
In IE7, the CSS is being completely ignored and the page does not work (Note: I am behind a proxy, it might have something to do with it). It works with Firefox.<p>Also, I know of a domain, seventypercentwater.com, but it doesn't show up in the list when I search for "seventy". What am I missing?
Great app, found it from your first go-round here and obviously is much cleaner visually.<p>Would be nice to be able to only check certain extensions without losing too many points (.ly or .us only)<p>So useful, thank you.
Hi, since you already have lots of country-specific TLDs, I suggest you to add .br, or more specifically, ".com.br". I'm not sure on how you could profit from it, but I bet you can get some traffic from here.
Fantastic work! Just curious, why does it not return any results for long strings?<p>For example, putting "hacker" in the Beginning box and "ne" in the Ending box yields no results.
I didn't set any prefix or suffix and instead just selected all the radio buttons. Now I get it, but at first I was confused why no results are coming up.