Reminds me of an old gag I want to say I read that the old hacker quarterly 2600 did back in the day.<p>There was some kind of negativity towards a company, I can't recall which, and they registered companysucks.com. Obviously replace company with the actual name I can't remember.<p>They received a legal letter requesting they hand over that domain for copyright reasons and so on. They did with no argument. Then they registered companyreallysucks.com. Again with the letter with them handing the domain over with no argument.<p>Then they registered companyreallyreallysucks.com with the expected outcome.<p>I'm not sure how far that kept going until they tired of the joke or the company gave up.<p>Or, at least, that's the way I remember it. I could be wrong as it was quite a few years ago.
Thats great, my company owned ahhhhhhhhhhhh.com got approached to sell, no idea it was coke, found out later, but glad they did something cool with it.
At one time, in the late 90s and early 2000s, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., owned many thousands of variants of the words 'walmart' and various bad or negative words. A lot of that was in reaction to the visibility of (I believe) walmartsucks.com<p>One way or another, talk about an exercise in futility.
I don't want to test them all, but I am sure there is one that doesn't work (404). It should be around the middle.<p>I know because my spider told me.
What surprises me is that www.ah.com is owned by some health center in Wisconsin. Now I want to know how they got it, and how much did Coca-Cola offer them for it, if anything.
Yeah, I noticed this at the time when I was looking for users resolving recently-registered domains (to try to find hacked systems). One of my users resolved & then went to ahhhhhhhhh.com, which had only been registered a few weeks beforehand.<p>Had my attention for a few minutes, but was ultimately not interesting (at least not from a security point of view).