TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Physicists believe they can create matter from colliding photons

78 pointsby stonlybover 9 years ago

11 comments

dspeyerover 9 years ago
The timeline:<p><pre><code> 1934: This is predicted 1997: This is done http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;1997&#x2F;09&#x2F;16&#x2F;science&#x2F;scientists-use-light-to-create-particles.html 2014: We will &quot;demonstrate the feat within the next 12 months&quot; 2015: Didn&#x27;t bother</code></pre>
评论 #10795276 未加载
eloffover 9 years ago
Has anyone ever wondered why the C^2 in E=MC^2 I&#x27;m sure it wasn&#x27;t chosen at random just because a large constant was needed, it must fall out of some other physics equations.<p>But still, what does that mean? What does the transmutation of energy into mass or visa versa have to do with the universal speed limit?<p>I am always struck by the inexplicable power of mathematics to describe the physical laws of the universe, in often simple equations like this. It doesn&#x27;t have to be that way as far as we know.
评论 #10794592 未加载
评论 #10794599 未加载
评论 #10794568 未加载
评论 #10794583 未加载
评论 #10794810 未加载
评论 #10799331 未加载
评论 #10794548 未加载
评论 #10795149 未加载
fatunaover 9 years ago
This article appears to be 1,5 years old. So at least the 1 year deadline was missed.
jp555over 9 years ago
If we could trap those positrons somehow in large numbers...<p>Antimatter production?
评论 #10796254 未加载
doshover 9 years ago
This is exciting. Not sure how they will go from electron-positron creation to protons which needs quarks, but according to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Matter_creation" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Matter_creation</a><p>Summary: Matter creation is the conversion of massless particles into one or more massive particles. Since all known massless particles are bosons and the most familiar massive particles are fermions, usually what is considered is the process which converts two bosons (e.g. photons) into two fermions (e.g., an electron–positron pair). This process is known as pair production.<p>So technically, it is a matter creation.
评论 #10794302 未加载
评论 #10794339 未加载
venomsnakeover 9 years ago
Can anyone explain when and where the Higgs enters the reaction? That is the most interesting for me, since we don&#x27;t have anti Higgs.
评论 #10794214 未加载
评论 #10794099 未加载
评论 #10794315 未加载
评论 #10793008 未加载
ambrop7over 9 years ago
I imagine &quot;matter&quot; as commonly understood would contain at least electrons and protons, but they would just be making electrons and positrons. Can we make protons&#x2F;neutrons out of light too?
评论 #10794295 未加载
评论 #10794219 未加载
negamaxover 9 years ago
So was light first or matter?<p>Was there early radiation (light != visible light only) which created matter. H -&gt; He -&gt; Stars. Or matter preexisted?
评论 #10797028 未加载
评论 #10796261 未加载
maplechoriover 9 years ago
Are we going to be able to materialize dinner soon?
评论 #10794701 未加载
grondiluover 9 years ago
Didn&#x27;t we know that ever since E=mc² ?
评论 #10794218 未加载
mrerrormessageover 9 years ago
If this can be made practical at any scale, I think the most exciting applications will be in long-range space drives. Although it sounds as though immense amounts of energy are needed, not needing to take along matter to eject in order to move is a game changer for space exploration.
评论 #10794826 未加载
评论 #10794362 未加载