TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

You Can Always Find an Anonymous Former Employee to Trash the Founder

14 pointsby ssclafaniover 9 years ago

2 comments

x0x0over 9 years ago
Ok, so are there any posts by Hunter publicly trashing someone? If not, it must be because he&#x27;s had uniformly wonderful experiences with everyone with whom he&#x27;s interacted in the valley!<p>He also completely ignores power differentials between (often, but not always) connected and&#x2F;or well-off founders and their (often, but not always) less well-off, less connected, less known reports. For those of us who aren&#x27;t as plugged in as he is, the stuff that trickles out to the industry news is helpful. eg founders that have a history of treating dev teams like shit, or founders that have walked away with millions while their employees walked away with zero (Kevin Rose, etc.)
评论 #10796059 未加载
kafkaesqover 9 years ago
<i>For members of the tech community I believe it’s quite cowardly to give opinions, for print, without willing to be named as a source.</i><p>I take the other angle -- it&#x27;s quite cowardly (and shitty) for junior &quot;founders&quot; to take advantage of, or otherwise make life miserable for early employees in the ways they are prone to doing: bait-and-switch games with regard to compensation, equity, or verbal agreements; plain old harassment in sexual or other forms; or just sheer incompetence[1] -- and then expect these employees to not only take their lumps financially and emotionally, but to keep forever silent about it -- on fear of appearing &quot;embittered&quot; or &quot;vindictive.&quot;<p>So to those feel they need to keep their anonymity, in order to prevent the damage and humiliation they suffered from living on any further -- as long as they are being truthful, they have my understanding and support.<p>That is to say: in the right circumstances, there&#x27;s nothing shameful about preferring to stay anonymous for the sake one&#x27;s sanity and financial health. And in some cases, it may be downright prudent and necessary -- and for the better good of us all.<p>[1] &quot;We&#x27;re sorry things were kind of rough here for you at the beginning. Management was 23 years old, and very inexperienced&quot; was what was told to a friend of mine after moving across country to join a startup that promptly went bust, 6 weeks later -- sans severance, of course.