TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

CNI for Docker Containers with Weave and Calico

57 pointsby polviover 9 years ago

7 comments

NetStrikeForceover 9 years ago
I&#x27;ve got a strong interest on overlay networking solutions like Weave, but I&#x27;m not an expert on Docker and other container solutions.<p>What&#x27;s the new thing here? If I understood correctly, it seems that you can connect your Docker host to an overlay network, so your containers can access other containers and resources through it. Am I correct to think this facilitates orchestration of the containers&#x27; network?<p>Disclosure: I am behind <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wormhole.network" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wormhole.network</a> which could be seen as some sort of Weave competitor, but it&#x27;s not. It covers other use cases, even though there&#x27;s some overlapping e.g. overlay multi-host networking for containers <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;pjperez&#x2F;docker-wormhole" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;pjperez&#x2F;docker-wormhole</a> - it doesn&#x27;t require changes on the host itself, but can&#x27;t be orchestrated.
评论 #11062452 未加载
评论 #11061897 未加载
shykesover 9 years ago
I haven&#x27;t looked at this in detail, but does this work with the standard networking features introduced in Docker 1.9 [1] and 1.10 [2]? Can I still use &#x27;docker network create&#x2F;connect&#x27; and the DNS service discovery features of Docker? Can containers interoperate regardless of the choice of Docker plugin, or will they only work on a plugin based on the weave proxy? The wording in the post leaves that ambiguous.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.docker.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;11&#x2F;docker-multi-host-networking-ga&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.docker.com&#x2F;2015&#x2F;11&#x2F;docker-multi-host-networking...</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.docker.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;docker-1-10&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.docker.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;02&#x2F;docker-1-10&#x2F;</a>
评论 #11061710 未加载
评论 #11074139 未加载
politicianover 9 years ago
Does Weave still have atrocious network performance?
评论 #11063528 未加载
评论 #11074043 未加载
danfitchover 9 years ago
Video that goes into detail about what Calico. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?list=PLlh6TqkU8kg_Eydfk1Nyt6iK7wM8v9bRA&amp;v=-8qrULl-zkk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?list=PLlh6TqkU8kg_Eydfk1Nyt6iK...</a>
chrissnellover 9 years ago
Other than IPv6 support, is there a reason to use Calico&#x2F;Weave over Flannel? We&#x27;ve been very happy with Flannel, especially using the clean CoreOS-Flannel integration.
评论 #11074229 未加载
vetromover 9 years ago
I&#x27;m looking forward to setting up some trial deployments of calico at my workplace.<p>While there is an ease of understanding of bridged and&#x2F;or overlayed networks, native end-to-end routing between containers with regular IP datagrams and container-level addressability has been on my wishlist for a long time.
emeralddover 9 years ago
Am I the only one wondering who Calico is? (I&#x27;m not finding an obvious candidate with a quick Google search ...)
评论 #11061584 未加载
评论 #11060747 未加载