TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Influx alternatives for sub 100G data?

2 pointsby ramanathanrvabout 9 years ago
Influx HA cluster pricing is very expensive for our data size, which is sub 100G data. For a 3 node cluster, influx is charging $18,000 per annum.<p>https:&#x2F;&#x2F;influxdata.com&#x2F;pricing&#x2F;#product_subscriptions<p>We really like influx and heavily use the dimensioning feature in the TSD. Are there any influx like alternatives that are cheaper? I am willing to allocate $3,000 - $5,000 dollars (per annum) for this.

1 comment

omn1about 9 years ago
First question: Do you really need a cluster? We were running InfluxDB with a lot more data and ran on a single node. A single machine is surprisingly scalable.<p>If you are positive that you need a cluster, here are my suggestions: * Recently Elasticsearch has become a lot better at time series data, so it might be worth a try. * My second bet would be Cassandra. Look at these slides for more info: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;de.slideshare.net&#x2F;patrickmcfadin&#x2F;time-series-with-apache-cassandra-long-version" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;de.slideshare.net&#x2F;patrickmcfadin&#x2F;time-series-with-apa...</a> Not sure if this is supported by Grafana, though. * Another one would be Prometheus which also works with Grafana. Personally I&#x27;m not a big fan of its query language. Also clustering support is pretty limited there (and mostly needs to be handled by the client).
评论 #11389780 未加载