Sometimes my girlfriend reminds me that its kinda fucked up that I get excited when the things I need to understand are presented to me in a more readable way but still look like the Matrix to her.
I saw this before and it always looked like a nice pice of software. The sad part is, it is still at "0 releases".<p>To the developers of this software: please provide a stable release that can be packaged for the popular package managers/distributions. That will help to spread the word about your work and make it easily accessible.
I guess the news here is that they now use Capstone. I haven't tried either, but I'm excited for a de-facto standard open-source disassembler. A lot of great tools could come out of it. Now if we had something of similar quality for decompilers...
I've just never been a fan of console-based debugging. The greatest thing an IDE brings to the table for me is debugging against a GUI editor window.
Seems good. Actually what I like most is that it appears to be well documented, so it might be worth a try. I always found cumbersome to use console based debuggers, and wonder if there's any real advantage once the learning curve as been climbed.
Reminds me of gdb-dashboard [1] with the additional debugging engines supported. Very nice.<p>[1] <a href="https://github.com/cyrus-and/gdb-dashboard" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/cyrus-and/gdb-dashboard</a>
So... if it works cool but just in case I thought I'd point out some alternatives<p>* emacs <a href="https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Debuggers.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/De...</a><p>* VSCode <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/Docs/extensions/example-debuggers" rel="nofollow">https://code.visualstudio.com/Docs/extensions/example-debugg...</a><p>* Slickedit <a href="https://www.slickedit.com/products/slickedit/343-slickedit-has-debuggers" rel="nofollow">https://www.slickedit.com/products/slickedit/343-slickedit-h...</a>
Looks like a nice operating system, but it seems to lack a decent editor..<p>Edit: Downvoters, can you care to explain? I would actually like someone to reinvent Emacs (or Vim, for that matter) as something more general.