TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Global Task Exchange Protocol

63 pointsby madospaceabout 9 years ago

9 comments

smoyerabout 9 years ago
I would suggest this is the perfect example of a project which should extend SCIM [1], a recently release RFS for this functionality. SCIM is Simple Cross-domain Identity Management and allows sharing of user and group information via RESTful JSON APIs. It&#x27;s easily sufficient for vCard information and is also easily extensible. I think calendar and to-do information is the next step.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.simplecloud.info&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.simplecloud.info&#x2F;</a>
评论 #11510682 未加载
cjpabout 9 years ago
An ambitious idea. Some questions immediately spring to mind.<p>&gt; Task is owned by a Project. Project belongs to a User. User is a member of Domain.<p>Can Tasks have subtasks? Recursively? To an arbitrary depth?<p>Can Projects have subprojects? (see above)<p>I assume since a &quot;User&quot; is just an email address, a group email address would implement a &quot;Group&quot; at the &quot;User&quot; level?<p>In a company setting, Users (Contractors, Employees) come and go during the life of a Project. What happens to Tasks assigned to a User who leaves the (company|Domain|Project)?
评论 #11511102 未加载
epaulsonabout 9 years ago
I&#x27;d follow along with what the IndieWeb folks are doing. They&#x27;ve got a pretty good principle of reusing existing infrastructure in new ways to build interesting things without needing coordinated upgrades.<p>As an example, getting widespread adoption of a new TX DNS record type is unlikely, though you can fake it with TXT records.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;indiewebcamp.com&#x2F;Category:building-blocks" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;indiewebcamp.com&#x2F;Category:building-blocks</a>
评论 #11512046 未加载
评论 #11511658 未加载
fiatjafabout 9 years ago
The idea is great. Perhaps, however, it is too ambitious.<p>Maybe this could start as a thinner protocol, with adaptors to turn Todoist, Asana, Trello and Basecamp into clients.
评论 #11510552 未加载
secstateabout 9 years ago
As someone who uses Todoist for personal tasks, Asana at work, and Basecamp for those clients who haven&#x27;t migrate to Asana yet ... yes.<p>From a pragmatic perspective, I&#x27;m not sure this can gain traction. The mail exchange protocol was built in a very different environment, and you&#x27;d have to get some serious weight behind this to gain much traction.
评论 #11510937 未加载
评论 #11510538 未加载
d33about 9 years ago
&gt; Use private and public keys encryption<p>Yeah, sounds trivial.
评论 #11510785 未加载
thomasddabout 9 years ago
Had the same idea couple of times, whet I needed to distribute tasks between couple of servers. Now I can imagine it, as some sort of TCP service (like EMAIL) powered by DNS records and TCP server&#x2F;client. Maybe SMTP can be also used. This desires and requires more time and energy, maybe a team of people, maybe open standard and SW implementation of TCP services. This could be used, not only for humas, but also for automation.
评论 #11510820 未加载
michaelmiorabout 9 years ago
What is the use case? (Ideally, use cases -- plural.) I can sort of extrapolate from what is written but it would be great to have that clearly stated.
评论 #11510985 未加载
skybrianabout 9 years ago
I&#x27;m not getting what this is for. It seems to be something about automation around arbitrary people on the Internet giving you work to do. It seems like this is a flaw to get rid of? Email and bug trackers make it all too easy.
评论 #11511633 未加载