This seems like a blatant overstepping of bounds.<p>Although Tor is specifically called out, it would seem as though this would apply to usage of any and all proxy or VPN services.<p>Can anyone else confirm this to be the case?
Does this seem like someone reading too much into the opinion? Maybe it could be used this way, but it could just as easy fail judicial review. There is some precedent of course (simply carrying lockpicks can be a crime), but I wouldn't be surprised if a LEO attempting to interpret this ruling this way would be slapped down by the courts.