TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Five Pacific islands disappear as sea levels rise

58 pointsby abhi3about 9 years ago

6 comments

elgabogringoabout 9 years ago
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;environment&#x2F;2016&#x2F;may&#x2F;10&#x2F;headlines-exaggerated-climate-link-to-sinking-of-pacific-islands" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theguardian.com&#x2F;environment&#x2F;2016&#x2F;may&#x2F;10&#x2F;headlines...</a><p>&quot;Report’s author says many media outlets have misinterpreted the science by conflating sea-level rise with climate change&quot;
评论 #11671989 未加载
jb613about 9 years ago
Interesting counter-argument[1] suggests 1) data was cherry picked:<p>&quot;The alarmistic claim originates from riding the positive phase of the inter-annual, decadal and multi-decadal oscillations typical of the sea levels over a cherry picked short time window of 10-15 years, neglecting what was measured before 1994 by another tide gauge in pretty much same location, and also neglecting what has been measured in the same tide gauge since 2009.<p>Short records do not permit to clear the trend of the inter-annual, decadal and multi-decadal oscillations [4-8]. In the Solomon Islands there is no tide gauge long enough to infer a proper trend. However, the information available permits to dismiss the alarmist claim of 7-10 mm yr-1 rate of rise.&quot;<p>2) statistically not enough data for trends in sea levels:<p>&quot;Also including Honiara II, starting from December 1974 the rate of rise is +2.81 mm yr-1. The time window is now 42 years long, still insufficient, but certainly more reasonable. Considering 60-70 years of data are needed to start understanding a trend in sea levels, very likely these +2.81 mm yr-1 are still an overestimation of the relative rate of rise.&quot;<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wattsupwiththat.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;05&#x2F;10&#x2F;busted-claim-data-shows-that-climate-induced-sea-level-rise-didnt-wipe-out-five-solomon-islands&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wattsupwiththat.com&#x2F;2016&#x2F;05&#x2F;10&#x2F;busted-claim-data-sho...</a>
评论 #11672668 未加载
评论 #11672850 未加载
jdavis703about 9 years ago
You know what&#x27;s sad? I remember my right-wing geography teacher telling us students that this would happen way back in the 90s. It&#x27;s sad that one of the main parties in U.S. politics doesn&#x27;t think this could, would or is happening.
评论 #11672548 未加载
评论 #11673056 未加载
评论 #11672461 未加载
doucheabout 9 years ago
How many new Pacific islands were created by volcanic or other processes this year?
评论 #11672684 未加载
0xsnowcrashabout 9 years ago
It&#x27;s a problem that&#x27;s been recognised for some time. In fact the United Nations had the third conference on this back in 2014. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.un.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;development&#x2F;desa&#x2F;news&#x2F;sustainable&#x2F;focus-on-sustainable-islands.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.un.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;development&#x2F;desa&#x2F;news&#x2F;sustainable&#x2F;focus...</a>
danieltillettabout 9 years ago
Out of curiosity for those that don&#x27;t believe global warming is human caused, what evidence would convince you to change your mind?
评论 #11672325 未加载
评论 #11672239 未加载
评论 #11672458 未加载
评论 #11672867 未加载
评论 #11672298 未加载
评论 #11672751 未加载
评论 #11672237 未加载
评论 #11672819 未加载