I created a website for my own research. I just grab a piece of study and write down facts from it. Later on I connect facts with each other and compose them in articles (answers to questions) to have a base to discuss the subject. I think the website has potential for broader use, so I wanted to ask for feedback. What do you think about it? Would you find it useful for yourself? Do you miss any feature in particular?<p>http://evidenceba.se<p>Here are some examples of how the website works:<p>Did you know that humans can regrow eye lens after cataract surgery?
http://evidenceba.se/answers/16-yes-but-for-now-it-was-only-achieved-in-infants-answer-to-can-lens-of-human-eye-be-regenerated-after-cataract-surgery<p>Or that allergies might be treated with probiotics?
http://evidenceba.se/answers/17-allergies-can-be-treated-with-prebiotics-answer-to-how-can-you-cure-allergy<p>Here is how you can see that a statement from a study (or an article) is suspicious:
http://evidenceba.se/facts/72-statins-stimulate-cancer
as you can see there is strong evidence against it.<p>Or you can see that certain disagreement is based purely on opinions of researchers and not on the proper science:
http://evidenceba.se/facts/17-benefits-of-statins-and-of-lowering-cholesterol-in-lowering-mortality-are-known-since-1994-4s-study
notice how all of the statements are marked as opinions.