TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

DNS: Basic Concepts (2013)

162 pointsby rhubarbcustardalmost 9 years ago

12 comments

callmeedalmost 9 years ago
If you want a startup&#x2F;side-project idea, here it is. I can tell you from 10+ years in website hosting and maintenance that most laypeople, designers, marketers, and even some technical people will <i>never</i> understand DNS. (and they shouldn&#x27;t have to)<p>A small business wants a website at SquareSpace, cloudflare CDN, email at Google Apps, landing pages on a subdomain with Unbounce, their blog on yet another subdomain, and DKIM&#x2F;SPF records for the email newsletter system.<p>Setting this up is not easy for most people. Most people aren&#x27;t even sure <i>where</i> to do it–let alone <i>how</i> to do it. (is your registrar handling your DNS? sometimes ...)<p>If you had a 1 or 2-click tool that setup these for people, maybe wrapped it around some domain search&#x2F;affiliate tools, I think you could make some money.<p>My 2¢
评论 #11864283 未加载
评论 #11864841 未加载
评论 #11867360 未加载
评论 #11864422 未加载
aljonesalmost 9 years ago
<i>&quot;Email is so important to the functioning of the Internet that it gets its own record type.&quot;</i><p>Well that is one way of looking at it. Probably the appropriate way if you&#x27;re teaching, but if you want to be critical then it reeks of poor design for a particular service to get special treatment by a fundamental part of the internet. It isn&#x27;t that MX records aren&#x27;t needed. They just shouldn&#x27;t only be useful for email.
评论 #11864074 未加载
评论 #11866161 未加载
评论 #11866438 未加载
评论 #11865085 未加载
axaxsalmost 9 years ago
&#x27;This is why you can&#x27;t have a CNAME on a root domain like petekeen.net, because you generally have to have other records for that domain like MX&#x27;<p>While in theory that&#x27;s common, the primary reason is because of the SOA record that must exist.
评论 #11863977 未加载
nine_kalmost 9 years ago
A very short, beginner-level intro to DNS.
评论 #11865427 未加载
dominotwalmost 9 years ago
Learning networking&#x2F;tcp&#x2F;dns has been a pain for me for years. I can never wrap my head around it properly despite many attempts.<p>I blame it on not having easy access to throwaway playgrounds.<p>I recently found this project <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;mininet.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;mininet.org&#x2F;</a> which promises throwaway network playgrounds. Hopefully it will help me finally learn networks for good.
评论 #11865918 未加载
评论 #11867322 未加载
Abundnce10almost 9 years ago
<i>Almost always you&#x27;ll want to redirect a bare domain like iskettlemanstillopen.com to www.iskettlemanstillopen.com. Registrars like Namecheap and DNSimple call this a URL Redirect. In Namecheap you would set up a URL Redirect like this...</i><p>I prefer my domains to be naked (as opposed to www.), but I typically redirect all www-traffic in my web server (NGINX). Is this the wrong approach?
评论 #11864214 未加载
评论 #11864883 未加载
评论 #11866412 未加载
评论 #11864119 未加载
评论 #11864173 未加载
knownalmost 9 years ago
OpenNIC is a user controlled Network Information Center offering a democratic and non-national alternative to the traditional Top-Level Domain registries. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.opennicproject.org&#x2F;HomePage" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.opennicproject.org&#x2F;HomePage</a>
评论 #11868057 未加载
jasonbennealmost 9 years ago
This is also a nice overview from the dnsimple guys:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;howdns.works&#x2F;ep1&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;howdns.works&#x2F;ep1&#x2F;</a>
wineisfinealmost 9 years ago
Anyone tried the &quot;new&quot; namecheap custom dns settings? Like glueing nameservers?<p>Its one of the poorest interfaces ever created in the history of mankind.
gistalmost 9 years ago
Anyone old enough to remember movie.edu and the grasshopper O&#x27;Reilly 1st Edition DNS&amp;Bind book?
评论 #11865921 未加载
_RPMalmost 9 years ago
I thought they were going to get into the binary protocol.
评论 #11863601 未加载
riobardalmost 9 years ago
So, which are the good parts?
评论 #11868304 未加载
评论 #11863911 未加载