Why would you need a web exposed UI?<p>I guess you could have a local only port to use on a server backend like a reverse proxy but you definitely don't want this public web facing.<p>imagemagick is used because it is binary library used on the backend<p>now if this was a dropin library and command line compatible, adoption would be 100%
It's clear we can improve our messaging about ways to integrate Imageflow. The command-line tool aspect is under-emphasized, and the libimageflow aspect seems to be confusing as well. What other things are unclear initially (or are still confusing)?