TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Shadow Banking: Goldman’s derivative exposure 25K% of assets in ‘08, 33K% in ‘09

16 pointsby dsplittgerberabout 15 years ago

5 comments

T_S_about 15 years ago
OK. This statistic refers to notional value. Adding up notional values makes as much sense as adding apples, oranges, yen and dollars. Actually it makes less sense than that. You cannot understand a bank's book without access to the individual line items.<p>If you have the line items, you have everything. Without that you have to rely on high level financial statements and the opinions of bank examiners or other regulators. And as Lehman, Madoff, Enron and other cases show, it means you have nothing.<p>It is time for banks, who operate a public trust, to offer continuous (lagged) line item disclosure to enable crowdsourcing of risk analysis. The markets are running on the informational equivalent of fumes. No wonder they sputter.<p>I call this Real Transparency. It is no more intrusive than the fact that I can find out how much you paid for your house and how much you borrowed to buy it. Information like this is necessary for the functioning of a proper market and price system. These are worth preserving more than the privileges of banks.<p>Real Transparency is the kind of regulatory reform that would make a difference. Not the kind which gives power hungry regulators more information to ignore.
评论 #1193743 未加载
grandalfabout 15 years ago
the derivative exposure could be risk-reducing, fwiw.
评论 #1193748 未加载
mattmaroonabout 15 years ago
People (not economists) always blame the crisis on bad lending. That's like saying the guy who had full-blown AIDS died of pneumonia. It's true in a literal sense, but it's not meaningful in that you're blaming the symptom rather than the disease.
shrikantabout 15 years ago
Uh, it's 25 and 32 THOUSAND % each!
评论 #1193495 未加载
mos1about 15 years ago
Summing notional values is not an intelligent or accurate way to determine a firm's derivative exposure.<p>Please don't use the terms interchangeably.