TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

On Uber’s Choice of Databases

169 pointsby narfzalmost 9 years ago

5 comments

Beanisalmost 9 years ago
All of these response posts seem to miss one big piece that made no sense to me. Uber goes really in-depth around the higher cost of updates in postgres, but then Uber describes Schemaless as an immutable append only data store. They created a custom database with no updates, but one of their primary reasons for changing from postgres to mysql was because of the high cost of updates?
评论 #12188330 未加载
评论 #12188513 未加载
评论 #12188316 未加载
segmondyalmost 9 years ago
This is a very good and fair response and anyone serious about tuning their DB should have use-the-index-luke.com bookmarked!
评论 #12189547 未加载
评论 #12189018 未加载
frankwilesalmost 9 years ago
This really all boils down to &quot;Ford F-150s are bad trucks because your cargo can get wet when it rains, use a U-Haul truck&quot;.<p>Sure, for that VERY specific (and not very common) use case U-Hauls beat F-150s. However, I think we can all agree that F-150s are far more versitle for most use cases, up to including something trivial like heading to Starbucks for a quick coffee.
azylmanalmost 9 years ago
The money quote to me that was really interesting was this one:<p>&gt; for a rapidly growing company, technology is easier to change than people.
JoachimSchipperalmost 9 years ago
This is a response to Uber&#x27;s article, discussed at <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12166585" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=12166585</a>.