The paper recommends sentence based fingerprints.<p>I've used rfc1751[0] which is word-based rather than sentence-based, but it's pretty convenient. I use it for my password sharing tool[1] which creates prompts that look like<p><pre><code> === secrets.vm ===
common name: secrets.vm
fingerprint: b957e10c998faa9909cff3ba4ec35485d04708c3ecc7481fe14d7f07bc0229cd
public key: c15e697e4807793ef8a9461a7b2c6cf2266d1ec1480a594e83b54e7b75e07702
public sign: f1db594eb55fe97657c57f2aa01afd1210a46d42d80d5552ac4d548162d4968e
mnemonic: AM ROBE KIT OMEN BATE ICY TROY RON WHAT HIP OMIT SUP LID CLAY AVER LEAR CAVE REEL CAN PAM FAN LUND RIFT ACME
does that look right? [y/n]
</code></pre>
where "mnemonic" is the rfc1751 mnemonic of the sha256 of the other fields and is designed to be shouted across a room.<p>I'd definitely be interested in a standardised sentence-based fingerprinting system akin to rfc1751<p>[0]: <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1751" rel="nofollow">https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1751</a><p>[1]: <a href="https://github.com/ketralnis/secrets" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/ketralnis/secrets</a>
My WAG at this problem a few years ago: <a href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Gmaxwell/visual_fingerprint_comparison" rel="nofollow">https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/User:Gmaxwell/visual_fingerprint_...</a>