TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

A pilot who stole a secret Soviet fighter jet

173 pointsby alongtheflowover 8 years ago

8 comments

nikcubover 8 years ago
One big difference between Soviet technology and American - the former was designed to be cheap, rugged and to survive a nuclear war.<p>Unlike similar American jets, you can find Mig-25&#x27;s in private hands today being maintained and flying.<p>It is one of the only private experiences where you can break Mach 2 and get close to 90,000&#x27; feet[0].<p>I love the Mig-25 - like the AK-47 there is something very admirable in a plane that is designed to both perform so well but to also be so easy to maintain and with such longevity.<p>[0] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rusadventures.com&#x2F;tour6.shtml" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rusadventures.com&#x2F;tour6.shtml</a><p>[1] &quot;edge of space&quot; flight - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=fCVMuxx7YKY" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=fCVMuxx7YKY</a>
评论 #12443843 未加载
评论 #12444184 未加载
评论 #12444123 未加载
评论 #12444361 未加载
评论 #12443826 未加载
pthaover 8 years ago
Hard to believe the Soviets were using vacuum tubes instead of transistors <i>In hindsight, the MiG 25, which the West had been so worried about, turned out to be a ‘paper tiger’. Its massive radar was years behind US models because instead of transistors it used antiquated vacuum tubes (a technology that did, however, make it impervious to electromagnetic pulses from nuclear blasts). The huge engines required so much fuel that the MiG was surprisingly short-ranged. It could take-off quickly, and fly in a straight line very fast to fire missiles or take pictures.</i>
评论 #12443892 未加载
评论 #12443444 未加载
评论 #12443639 未加载
评论 #12443968 未加载
jkotover 8 years ago
&gt; <i>The Soviets had not built the ‘super-fighter’ the Pentagon had feared, says Smithsonian aviation curator Roger Connor, but an inflexible aircraft built to do a very particular job.</i><p>There is no mention what MiG-25 was designed for. Its task was to intercept nuclear bombers flying over Soviet Union and it did this task pretty well.<p>Because it used steel it was cheap and easy to service. At that time soviets had lot of experience with titanium (space, submarines), but expensive plane similar to SR-71 would not cover entire Soviet Union.
评论 #12443565 未加载
评论 #12444402 未加载
评论 #12448769 未加载
评论 #12444149 未加载
CatsoCatsoCatsoover 8 years ago
Another very interesting aircraft is the experimental Su-47, with only one ever being built. Its forward-swept wing design make it a treat for the eye.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sukhoi_Su-47" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sukhoi_Su-47</a>
评论 #12443380 未加载
earcaraxeover 8 years ago
I love that the Japanese sent it back to Russia with a bill for shipping and the damage to the airfield.
评论 #12443309 未加载
neoCrimeLabsover 8 years ago
For a second I thought this was the story behind the 1977 book and 1982 film Firefox which were about the MiG-31. Might have been inspired though.<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Firefox_(novel)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Firefox_(novel)</a><p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Firefox_(film)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Firefox_(film)</a>
thesnowdogover 8 years ago
&quot;You must think in Russian&quot;
评论 #12442695 未加载
评论 #12442876 未加载
评论 #12443613 未加载
to3mover 8 years ago
Interesting interview with Viktor Belenko, not terribly deep but worthy of your time: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.videofact.com&#x2F;english&#x2F;defectors2_4en.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.videofact.com&#x2F;english&#x2F;defectors2_4en.html</a>
评论 #12448364 未加载