Interesting presentation, mostly well done :)<p>It would be easier to read if each spoke kept each browser colour in the same space. It's much easier to quickly memorize and patrec spatial relationships than colour relationships. If "light blue" (FF 3.5) was in the same location on every spoke, this would be much more useful.
I like the presentation idea, but it should be inverted, so that browsers that have most features would be the innermost ring and create a nice consistent ring around. The outliers in providing features than would become graphically that as well, outliers.
It interestingly scales up and down when you use your mouse wheel over it.<p>I'd also make the CSS3 category color something other than a yellow that close to the Safari 4 color.
Wow, looks like people are out with their claws over what is just a simple, fun experiment with CSS transforms.<p>FWIW, if you dont like it you can try tweaking it yourself : <a href="http://github.com/paulirish/html5readiness.com" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/paulirish/html5readiness.com</a>
The fact that even IE 9 is missing several important things, like the SQL db and Canvas, is ridiculous. I guess it's early-stage enough that they might add more. If not, I think IE might finally die when people see all these cool HTML5 near-desktop-quality webapps that say "just download Chrome or FF and you can use me."
I think that HTML5/CSS3 may bring back the days of useless animations, horrible text effects, and web pages plagued by usability problems due to the implementation of "features" for the sake of novelty that we had the "pleasure" experiencing in the 1990's.<p>I'm looking at all those novices out there that use Expression/FrontPage/Dreamweaver as their environment of choice for writing HTML once those WYSIWYG tools begin to incorporate HTML5/CSS3 into their toolkits.<p>The rest of us will make good use of these new features and only implement them when it makes sense. Sadly, many unprofessional elements within the web design community will be all too eager to show off their newfound "sKiLLz".
Tut tut tut, poor/non-existent support for 1024x768 monitors. The worst fact is the page hijacks the mouse scroll so it took me a few reloads and zoom-outs to realise there was some really bad placed text at the bottom
If you were curious about what this looks like in IE8 <a href="http://i41.tinypic.com/24eatud.png" rel="nofollow">http://i41.tinypic.com/24eatud.png</a>