TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Signal and Giphy

225 pointsby Spakmanover 8 years ago

15 comments

mnxover 8 years ago
This is a clever way to do this, but it still seems like someone caring about their privacy should just do without gifs.<p>Edit: I should rephrase - I mean someone with a larger-than-usual need for privacy, someone paranoid for a reason. This is great for the typical privacy concious user. But if I was sending documents to WikiLeaks, I would not sum them up with a cute GIF.
评论 #12853550 未加载
评论 #12855182 未加载
评论 #12853528 未加载
评论 #12854175 未加载
评论 #12853552 未加载
评论 #12853540 未加载
评论 #12853633 未加载
评论 #12853582 未加载
评论 #12857791 未加载
raverbashingover 8 years ago
Good<p>They know that for a bigger adoption they need those usability improvements, at the same time, they make sure additional features don&#x27;t compromise the security expected from their app
评论 #12854461 未加载
cryptarchover 8 years ago
Is there a federated and&#x2F;or self-hosted alternative to Signal with similar privacy and security properties? Even if it supports fewer platforms?<p>I&#x27;ve been getting more and more interested in running my own (and perhaps my friends&#x27;) infrastructure, but I haven&#x27;t found anything better than IRC for chat.
评论 #12853830 未加载
评论 #12853857 未加载
评论 #12854077 未加载
评论 #12855563 未加载
kbartover 8 years ago
<i>&quot;For instance, if someone messages you with an invitation, you might want to write back with a message that says &quot;I&#x27;m excited.&quot; With integrated GIF search, you could instead do a GIF search for &quot;I&#x27;m excited&quot; and send one of the results instead.&quot;</i><p>What? Why? Is it some kind of attempt to become a new &quot;cool&quot; app? Sounds totally useless function to me, but if it helps to get more users, well, maybe that&#x27;s a good thing.
评论 #12853607 未加载
评论 #12853621 未加载
StavrosKover 8 years ago
It would be interesting for services to publish a public encryption key, so the signal client could encrypt the payload with that.<p>However, that has very limited usefulness, so I don&#x27;t see it happening soon.
评论 #12853617 未加载
wst_over 8 years ago
Can I, as a receiver, turn off this feature? Ex : get text messages instead of gifs.
评论 #12856695 未加载
评论 #12854015 未加载
newsignupover 8 years ago
&gt; The GIPHY service could use subtleties like TLS session resume or cache hits to try to correlate multiple requests as having come from the same client, even if they don&#x27;t know the origin.<p>How would a cache hit mean same user tried to search? TLS session resume, I can understand but cache hit only means same resource was accessed not same user tried to access.
评论 #12854192 未加载
评论 #12854648 未加载
nzpover 8 years ago
Great! Now that these easy, low-hanging-fruit features are taken care of, maybe we&#x27;ll get some of the more involved security oriented ones, like, IDK, having an indication if I verified a contact or not so I can, you know, know whether I should verify or not when the opportunity presents itself.
biznickmanover 8 years ago
Now if only my friends would use the service!
hk__2over 8 years ago
Reading this title I thought it was a word play on “Signal and Noise” and it’d be a post about how &#x2F;giphy adds noise to Slack conversations.
aluhutover 8 years ago
It makes me sad so see that they waste time on decoration like gif search but they don&#x27;t have a client I can use on my PC for example.
评论 #12854845 未加载
评论 #12857189 未加载
评论 #12854684 未加载
评论 #12857525 未加载
评论 #12856307 未加载
评论 #12855138 未加载
评论 #12855939 未加载
评论 #12862371 未加载
lalulualaover 8 years ago
This is what Canonical did with Amazon searches on Unity, they proxified them.
评论 #12853800 未加载
piotrjurkiewiczover 8 years ago
Still no desktop client?
评论 #12853953 未加载
评论 #12853957 未加载
zlatan_todoricover 8 years ago
Oh great, they are catching up with Wire (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wire.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wire.com&#x2F;</a>).<p>Now if they would just resolve real bugs (like many people not being able to register to Signal), that would be maybe cool (but as they implemented Signal Protocol to WhatsApp and others (if we can trust code we can&#x27;t see) I can&#x27;t say I see any point in it).<p>Maybe I am wrong, but it lost that appeal it had some time in past.
评论 #12860404 未加载
MikusRover 8 years ago
That fake video on top is interesting. If they can&#x27;t even get that right what does it say about their Privacy and Security claims?
评论 #12853771 未加载