TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Google AppEngine – Java vs Python Performance Comparison

29 pointsby iamelgringoabout 15 years ago

6 comments

bad_userabout 15 years ago
This is because in Java land startup speed isn't viewed as something important.<p>Groovy also has the poorest runtime IMHO. JRuby or Clojure are in a better shape.
Estragonabout 15 years ago
I'm confused. Why isn't scala also affected by the loading-time issue? It's running on top of the JVM, too...
评论 #1291401 未加载
grandalfabout 15 years ago
I love app engine and if it had SSL I'd use it for all projects I do ... BUT: It feels odd to run the speed analysis tool in google webmaster tools and discover that my very simple site is slower than 80% of the sites on the internet...<p>I use python, btw, so it's still fairly fast, but for some reason even the simplest pages (one datastore request by key and a simple template) are still not "fast" compared to the rest of the internet.
j_bakerabout 15 years ago
Here's a very good explanation of why python performance is faster than java on GAE: <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1085898/choosing-java-vs-python-on-google-app-engine/1087878#1087878" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1085898/choosing-java-vs-...</a>
评论 #1291147 未加载
gte910habout 15 years ago
I was under the impression that Java was faster (even in startup time)...wow. Hope this summary is correct, as I didn't have plans to swap to the java ecosystem.
评论 #1291189 未加载
toddhabout 15 years ago
It's a little ironic given slow startup time was a major reason why we switched away from CGI in the first place.