TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Acquiring administrative access to Azure's RedHat Update infrastructure

93 pointsby imduffy15over 8 years ago

8 comments

matt_wulfeckover 8 years ago
&gt; <i>Given no gpgcheck is enabled, with full administrative access to the Red Hat Enterprise Linux Appliance REST API one could have uploaded packages that would be acquired by client virtual machines on their next yum update.</i><p>And given how hard it is to detect backdoor software, this is a HUGE security blunder. This could have literally installed a rootkit on every rhel instance on Azure.
评论 #13045341 未加载
imduffy15over 8 years ago
Follow up post for anyone that is interested... You&#x27;ve got root, can you get more access to the users azure account? The answer is yes. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ianduffy.ie&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2016&#x2F;11&#x2F;27&#x2F;azure-bug-bounty-root-to-storage-account-administrator&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ianduffy.ie&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2016&#x2F;11&#x2F;27&#x2F;azure-bug-bounty-root-to-...</a>
colinbartlettover 8 years ago
I&#x27;m curious to know if a bounty was paid for this and how much.
评论 #13043989 未加载
matthiasbover 8 years ago
There was a thread yesterday where lots of people were complaining about HSMs (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13031155" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=13031155</a>). I think this is an example where it would have helped to secure the private key in an HSM instead of the server itself.<p>Now the author states the keys have been rotated but now the next hacker know where to look.
评论 #13043994 未加载
jonehollandover 8 years ago
So, it seems that the attack vector was that Microsoft was running RHUI Log Collector open to the public internet for some reason.<p>Considering that&#x27;s from Redhat, and not Microsoft, I do wonder if this is a non sensible default setup issue and there may be many enterprises running this out in the open.
评论 #13046349 未加载
ChargingWookieover 8 years ago
Am I misreading this or does this really allow arbitrary packages to masquerade as legitimate packages?!
评论 #13045346 未加载
shshhdhsover 8 years ago
It sounds like they fixed the RHEL Update infrastructure, but they didn&#x27;t fix this:<p>&quot;Additionally, if you duplicated a Red Hat Enterprise Linux virtual hard disk and created a new instance from it all billing association seemed to be lost but repository access was still available&quot;
评论 #13043979 未加载
bhaisaabover 8 years ago
Another reason to be away from MS cloud. Good work man.