TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Leduc ramjet

53 pointsby LordFrithover 8 years ago

5 comments

rwmjover 8 years ago
More about that coal-powered supersonic plane (that didn&#x27;t fly): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Lippisch_P.13a" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Lippisch_P.13a</a> <i>&quot;Initially, it was proposed that a wire-mesh basket holding coal be mounted behind a nose air intake, protruding slightly into the airflow and ignited by a gas burner ... The coal was to take the form of small granules instead of irregular lumps, to produce a controlled and even burn, and the basket was altered to a mesh drum revolving on a vertical axis at 60 rpm.&quot;</i>
masklinnover 8 years ago
Ramjets do live on to an extent, in NASA technological demonstrators but also more interestingly in the SR-71&#x27;s legendary J58 engines, which switch to from mostly turbojet at low speeds to mostly ramjet at high speeds: the compressor is almost entirely bypassed then[0] and the vast majority of thrust comes from the &quot;afterburner&quot;, hence the engine&#x27;s maximum efficiency being around Mach 3.2.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Pratt_%26_Whitney_J58#&#x2F;media&#x2F;File:SR71_J58_Engine_Airflow_Patterns.svg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Pratt_%26_Whitney_J58#&#x2F;media&#x2F;F...</a>
评论 #13064287 未加载
fernlyover 8 years ago
Momentarily confused between a ramjet[1] and a valveless pulsejet[2] -- the latter are played with by many amateurs( e.g.[3]) producing amusing videos of their cherry-red glow and eardrum-piercing noise.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ramjet" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ramjet</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Valveless_pulsejet" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Valveless_pulsejet</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=8cR6bD57AKw" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=8cR6bD57AKw</a>
评论 #13061734 未加载
marktangotangoover 8 years ago
I love the hardware the old aircraft and rocket designers came up with(!), and built(!), and flew! For example the ultra heavy lift rocket designs the Air Force solicited in the 50&#x27;s and 60&#x27;s, to put military outposts on the moon. The Sea Dragon is a favorite of mine [1]. Not built nor flown, but really interesting.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sea_Dragon_(rocket)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Sea_Dragon_(rocket)</a>
ragebolover 8 years ago
Not sure whether the TIE fighter-like sound on the second movie clip [0] is edited in or that a nazi aircraft really did sound like an Empire spacecraft<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;MvtxjSrImHw?t=41s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;MvtxjSrImHw?t=41s</a>
评论 #13062521 未加载