TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu

192 pointsby AJAlabsover 8 years ago

8 comments

taericover 8 years ago
I really want to like docker for end user applications. However, until the problem of sanely sharing users into the container is solved, it is something that merely works well right up to the point you try to do something useful.<p>I suppose this can be sidestepped by allowing root in all of your containers for the applications. I am curious if that actually provides security benefits, though.
评论 #13071793 未加载
评论 #13093277 未加载
therealmarvover 8 years ago
Don&#x27;t be confused. CS Docker Engine is not the public available Docker Engine: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.docker.com&#x2F;cs-engine&#x2F;install&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.docker.com&#x2F;cs-engine&#x2F;install&#x2F;</a>
评论 #13072665 未加载
darren0over 8 years ago
Did I read that correctly? This will be delivered as a snap package?
评论 #13071508 未加载
hackcrafterover 8 years ago
I&#x27;m worried about Docker living up to its valuation, and I haven&#x27;t seen the business model that will meet the expectation of their valuation long-term yet.<p>They have built a great open source product, but now that there has been a collective shift to understanding the benefits of containers, the docker runtime + container format will&#x2F;should be commoditized by infrastructure companies (Google, RedHat, MS etc).<p>So where is the value-add of Docker the company going to come from?<p>edit: s&#x2F;evaluation&#x2F;valuation
评论 #13072856 未加载
ausjkeover 8 years ago
thought Canonical is doing its own &quot;docker&quot;, e.g. SNAP, lxd etc that are not totally identical but very similar to docker, what&#x27;s going on here.
评论 #13071532 未加载
评论 #13071493 未加载
bogomipzover 8 years ago
Does anyone know if this means anything significant in regards to LXD?
评论 #13075549 未加载
limaover 8 years ago
This makes me feel good about going with CentOS for Docker. Red Hat has a custom, stable Docker version which is rock-solid (albeit somewhat old, 1.10).
评论 #13071719 未加载
评论 #13075215 未加载
评论 #13071316 未加载
评论 #13073479 未加载
评论 #13071279 未加载
评论 #13071415 未加载
评论 #13071908 未加载
评论 #13071360 未加载
评论 #13071720 未加载
ronjouchover 8 years ago
Can OP or an admin de-abbreviate &quot;CS&quot; to &quot;Commercially-Supported&quot;?
评论 #13071552 未加载
评论 #13072078 未加载
评论 #13074527 未加载