Refreshing. The hype around AI/machine learning in places like here and TechCrunch is exhausting. It doesn't help when people like Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk speculate about nightmare scenarios that seem to have both feet firmly in the distant future. We're so, so far away from anything resembling so-called "general intelligence". It's totally nuts to compare clever engineering scenarios like Google's Go project to general intelligence. It just isn't.<p>My theory is that paid per click advertising/clickbait is making it increasingly difficult to say anything that gets attention on the internet, so people increasingly use hyperbole. "Internet journalists" will trump things up to make it sound more exciting, feeding the hype machine. Those that don't succumb to the practice are just not heard. There are, of course, exceptions. But a well-reasoned, calmly stated argument from a nobody is never going to go viral in the way that an outlandish story from that same nobody could. i.e. Seth Godin doesn't have reach just because he's interesting, it's also because he's been working at it for over a decade, but any idiot can make up some fake story that goes viral and impacts the public consciousness.
I guess because business people tend to be confused by hype or anti-hype and sometimes unable to care about five years from now this is a realistic message.<p>But he really emphasized the supervision and input -> output parts which is a bit of an oversimplification. There is definitely less supervision than before and demos from groups like Deep Mind or OpenCog that are powerful interactive agents.