TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

The Nature of Lisp (2006)

54 pointsby b-manabout 15 years ago

3 comments

DrJokepuabout 15 years ago
Commenting on the last paragraph: I honestly believe that one of the biggest obstacles for newcomers to Lisp is Emacs.<p>Don't get me wrong, I love Emacs and it is truly the superior environment to do work in Lisp. However it has a bit of a steep learning curve just like Lisp itself and fighting two battles (one with Lisp and one with Emacs) is no easy task for someone coming from a Java / C# and Eclipse / Visual Studio background. I know because I've been there. That's why I decided to start work on an open source Visual Studio add-in to support for Common Lisp in Visual Studio itself. I think being able to do the first steps in a familiar environment would be a great help for newcomers. I wonder what you guys think of the idea?
评论 #1320005 未加载
评论 #1319821 未加载
评论 #1319873 未加载
评论 #1319758 未加载
pchristensenabout 15 years ago
An oldie but goodie. This helped explain a lot of the often-praised features of Lisp and functional programming that had never made sense before.
评论 #1319882 未加载
评论 #1319389 未加载
评论 #1319289 未加载
eruabout 15 years ago
&#62; After all, I was almost blinded by the infamous Lisp parentheses!<p>Lisp's parenthesis seem to share their deterrence factor with Python's significant indentation. Most people who have used one of them for a while don't even notice them any longer. At least not as a problem.<p>Interestingly, Haskell seems to be strange enough, that nobody fears its significant indentation.
评论 #1320075 未加载
评论 #1319953 未加载