I don't like the new look.<p><a href="http://i.imgur.com/Uw2ry.png" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/Uw2ry.png</a><p>If I wanted it to look like Bing, I'd use Bing.
<i>Most of those details are hashed out at a daily "stand-up" meeting of roughly 10 people, held at 4:07 p.m. (Google co-founder Sergey Brin once estimated that it took seven minutes to walk across the Google campus; it's now company tradition that meetings end on the hour and new ones start seven minutes later.)</i><p>Um, what? This isn't something I've heard of.
The article says that Google doesn't disclose which part of revenues comes from AdWords and which from AdSense. But what about this slide from their quarterly earnings report <a href="http://i.imgur.com/v0ijp.png" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/v0ijp.png</a> I always assumed that "google.com" refers to AdWords and "network" refers to AdSense.
On a side note, what is the origins of the tradition in business magazines to enclose the stock ticker symbol after a listed company's name? (Inc. magazine is another one where I notice this quite strongly)
On the scale of Google I wonder if that little bit of added complexity lower overall click through on the ads.
Wonder why they don't also stretch the search out across the page like their top bar is, when you have 1920 pixels across it seems cramped.
Good insider perspective on the process - for better or for worse. I'm sure we'll get used to the new layout, I can already see how his will save me from moving my mouse around too much.<p>Now only if we could get IMDb.com redesigned!
Danny Sullivan's new design in-depth:
<a href="http://searchengineland.com/meet-the-new-google-41286" rel="nofollow">http://searchengineland.com/meet-the-new-google-41286</a>