TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

What Intelligence Agencies Concluded About Russian Attack on the U.S. Election

14 pointsby RealGeekover 8 years ago

2 comments

stockpuppetsover 8 years ago
Summary from a previously deleted comment here:<p><pre><code> &quot;It&#x27;s concerning how influential Russia&#x27;s propaganda &amp; PsyOps campaign has affected America(ns)&quot; </code></pre> It&#x27;s interesting to hear about the recent talking points in major news media publications about &quot;FAKE NEWS&quot; which is just newspeak for Propaganda.<p>Some might not be aware, but in 2013 the US removed protections against domestic propaganda:<p><pre><code> The U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (Public Law 80-402), popularly called the Smith–Mundt Act, specifies the terms in which the United States government can engage global audiences, also known as propaganda. The act was first introduced as the Bloom Bill in December 1945 in the 79th Congress and subsequently passed by the 80th Congress and signed into law by President Harry S. Truman on January 27, 1948. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (section 1078 (a)) amended the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987, allowing for materials produced by the State Department and the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to be released within United States borders for the Archivist of the United States. </code></pre> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.techdirt.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;20130715&#x2F;11210223804&#x2F;anti-propaganda-ban-repealed-freeing-state-dept-to-direct-its-broadcasting-arm-american-citizens.shtml" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.techdirt.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;20130715&#x2F;11210223804&#x2F;anti-...</a>
guscostover 8 years ago
Just a heads up, missing from the NYTimes highlights is a conclusion that RT ran anti-fracking activist programming as well, with the suggested goal being to increase dependence on Gazprom oil:<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dailycaller.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;06&#x2F;us-intel-report-confirms-kremlin-pushed-anti-fracking-propaganda&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;dailycaller.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;01&#x2F;06&#x2F;us-intel-report-confirms-k...</a><p>To get the most complete information it is usually a good idea to read this kind of report directly:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;icontherecord.tumblr.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;155494946443&#x2F;odni-statement-on-declassified-intelligence" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;icontherecord.tumblr.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;155494946443&#x2F;odni-stat...</a><p>The part about the anti-fracking stuff is on page 8.
评论 #13348002 未加载