This is disappointing... because an Obama cabinet member finds it impossible to accept that the Snowden releases were what they were claimed to be, notification of the public as to the depth of illegal domestic spying by the US Govt, an entire book is made on the premise?<p>The fact is, it's most likely as presented by Snowden, that he felt uneasy with the relative ease that privacy is being invaded. He's spoken out against similar programs internationally as well. He didn't intend to stay in Russia, the US Govt ensured that. The limitations of what was released, and some timing to uncover denials by govt agents/agencies etc.<p>If he were a spy, the disclosures would have been much more thorough, and the information taken would have been far more reaching.
Betteridge's law of headlines: “Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no.”<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines</a>