TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

CDN performance: Downloading jQuery from Google, Microsoft, and Edgecast CDNs

16 pointsby hamstersoupabout 15 years ago

2 comments

PanManabout 15 years ago
While interesting (and different results than I expected), I would say uptime here is even more important than access times: I'd rather have all my visitors wait 0.04 sec more, than a small percentage not having the page work at all. Another issue off course is that the files will be cached if your users have visited a site that uses the same CDN. I would guess that the Google CDN is most widespread, and a local cache hit is always faster than a CDN.
评论 #1342918 未加载
dedwardabout 15 years ago
Curious - considering that these companies pay for this content and bandwidth - are they actually offerring it up for public use, or is this just leeching off them?<p>The speed benefit is probably non-existant for something small like jquery - some simple far-future expires headers and proper cache management and site engineering will take care of that.<p>Further - including scripts from foreign sources in your pages also means you are trusting them to be secure - if that script is compromised, every site using it could be hijacked.
评论 #1343224 未加载