TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

Do you prefer Angelist over LinkedIn for hiring?

30 pointsby PrakashBhattaover 8 years ago

5 comments

kahnproover 8 years ago
I have the complete opposite experience with both. I live in Montreal. On LinkedIn, recruiters are spamming me weekly, so when I was looking for a job I just picked the one with the most human sounding message. I had the first job offer one week later.<p>On AngelList I was applying to companies myself and did two interviews with locally based startups. One of which was basically hipster central and turned me down after the interview because their highest developer pay was lower than my previous salary. The second one I interviewed at was Hopper, which I abandoned because their interview process is too long and drawn out for a startup. If I wanted this experience of probable rejection after months of interviewing, I would just apply to Google.<p>The only impression I got was that LinkedIn lead me to real businesses who have an immediate need for devs. AngelList has startups with an inflated sense of self-importance who wish they were in San Francisco.
评论 #13449972 未加载
noliteover 8 years ago
Mixed feelings - LinkedIn has great searching features for when you need something specific, but when you post ads, you get a ton of crap.<p>AngelList isn&#x27;t as great for specific filtering, but you get alot more targeted incomming requests when you post a job
dbg31415over 8 years ago
I really don&#x27;t like either.<p>I don&#x27;t like LinkedIn because I got a bunch of spam candidates. I also dislike that it doesn&#x27;t force job posters to disclose salary expectations before hand -- this is inefficient. (From an applicant perspective, I do like how easy LinkedIn makes snapping in a resume and submitting an application... but I have to wonder if making it fast to apply is really the best metric.)<p>I dislike Angel List because I have to accept just applicants profiles from Angel List as their application and I like to hit them up with a few basic questions first to save time. (As far as I&#x27;m concerned, we don&#x27;t need another Facebook-for-work type site on top of LinkedIn -- and LinkedIn has already won this battle.)<p>I like JazzHR quite a bit.
评论 #13443664 未加载
评论 #13443503 未加载
评论 #13442667 未加载
评论 #13442783 未加载
sarthakjainover 8 years ago
We hired 50% of a 10 person startup team from Angel List, rest from referals, no luck hiring from LinkedIn.<p>For startups AngelList makes a lot of sense and solves for problems like a wide variance in salary, non existent recruitment pipelines and general match making. Although the candidate pool is much smaller I think it helps keep the search focused. My personal experience with LinkedIn was a lot more spray and pray. LinkedIn does have much better candidate filtering if your looking for something very specific.
bsvalleyover 8 years ago
It&#x27;s all about where people hang out. From experience dealing with both I&#x27;d say you&#x27;ll mostly find candidates with lots of experience on linkedin versus angel list.<p>AngelList = ideal for early stage startups (1 to 20 people)<p>Linkedin = Larger startups&#x2F;companies(200 to +10000)