I'm not sure what kind of reporting news-leader.com generally does, but I feel like most of this story is missing.<p>Sure, he was structuring, which seems as ridiculous as 'precrime' to me. But why was the guy trying to flout reporting requirements? Why were they looking in to him? I'm positive that my bank transaction history would, at times, look odd- especially as I was ramping up to buy a house and move to a different state while starting a new company. Also, my credit union was always in Oregon, even when I wasn't- which lead to weird contortions like mailing myself a $5,000 check and a $2,500 check to then snap check them in to my business account with the same credit union because I hadn't taken the time to link them properly yet and the max you can snapcheck is $5K, and I didn't want to take the time to find a partner branch.<p>Maybe someone looked into it behind the scenes, maybe they didn't. Either way, my money never got frozen and I never got in trouble. Why? Because I wasn't up to no good. I'm not touting the "if you've got nothing to hide..." crap about being happy to give up my liberties, but in general, even when they're stomping all over our constitution you don't go to jail for no reason.
I understand that structuring may reveal a pattern for an illegal activity (money laundering, fraud, etc) and that law enforcement can used it as a hint to discover these activities.<p>But is structuring illegal by itself ? If so, it seems that presumption of innocence is ignored.<p>Am I missing something ?
It's [2016], here is the original source:<p><a href="https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdmo/pr/springfield-business-owner-pleads-guilty-structuring-financial-transactions" rel="nofollow">https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdmo/pr/springfield-business-ow...</a>