Where I work we use Bitbucket for code reviews. Their code review setup works well for us. We especially enjoy the "like" button that Codebrag also seems to have. It doesn't seem like Codebrag is very much different from this though.<p>A big way to differentiate for me would be if you could create "groups" or "teams" of reviewers. Say we have three teams sharing a code base. We could create a group for each of those teams. Then when someone opens a review I add the groups I need to look at it instead of the individuals on those teams.<p>One question I would have too is what is a "commit" in Codebrag? Is it literally review commit-by-commit, or is it more like a Pull Request in Github/Bitbucket terms? If it's the latter, I would rename it to not make the terms confusing.
Has there been a recent update with Codebrag? I try to keep an eye on the available code review tools and this one was last updated a while back. The last release/commit/tweet was last June.
It looks about the same as GitLab's merge request / code review feature to me. The being able to dismiss a commit is different, but I'm not sure I understand that feature.<p>When I'm doing a big review, I copy the list of files into a text document and check them off after I finish each one. I've found that especially useful when the order of the files requires a lot of jumping around to follow the flow. I'd like to see this feature supported by a code review tool.
I think this overlaps a lot with what github is already offering.<p>In github you can start a code review from a comment, mark a review as blocking, require at least an approving review prior to merge, etc... You can also add hooks for automated tests, etc.
Really needs a screencast or similar; I get what the tool is for, but it's really hard to see why or how it works without investing time and effort in setting it up and running it myself.