Nero AG opens antitrust case against MPEG LA

Original PDF source:<p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/05/17/Antitrust.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/05/17/Antitrust.pdf</a><p>But is this from January? <a href="http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-cacdce/case_no-2:2010cv00382/case_id-463131/" rel="nofollow">http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-cacdce/case_no-2:2010...</a><p>dupe? <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1371983" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1371983</a>

Yet another time I wish HN had a Batman spotlight we could shine into the sky to get grellas to analyze something. ;)

Is there a PDF link available? Scribd is terribly annoying, and the "Download" link is greyed out.

Blast from the past: On2 complains MPEG-4 patent pool violates antitrust laws: <a href="http://www.itworld.com/020411mpeg4" rel="nofollow">http://www.itworld.com/020411mpeg4</a>

FWIW, here's an article with a tiny bit of context and background, and the expected response from an MPEG-LA attorney: <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202458503025&#38;MPEG_LA_Shrugs_Off_Antitrust_Allegations" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202458503025&...</a>