TE
TechEcho
Home24h TopNewestBestAskShowJobs
GitHubTwitter
Home

TechEcho

A tech news platform built with Next.js, providing global tech news and discussions.

GitHubTwitter

Home

HomeNewestBestAskShowJobs

Resources

HackerNews APIOriginal HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 TechEcho. All rights reserved.

RIP LivingSocial: The fast rise and slow demise of a daily deals company

82 pointsby dannylandauabout 8 years ago

10 comments

owlyabout 8 years ago
I met a group of 6 living social employees in 2011 at a local meetup. They spoke so negatively about their company AND their partners/customers. This wasn't just run of the mill complaining about work or customers, it was really vile and made me sick. I vowed to never use their service and encouraged others to not use them. Why am I posting this? Because it is fundamental to any startups culture to be careful about how they present themselves to the rest of the tech community and the world.
评论 #13737711 未加载
swangabout 8 years ago
&gt; As executives reflect on LivingSocial’s fatal moment, all point to a security breach in April 2013. Hackers gained access to the account information of 50 million subscribers, and LivingSocial forced all of them to reset their passwords. About 20 percent never came back.<p>I don&#x27;t know how they came to this number, but at least it&#x27;s something to point to when the c-level executives decide password security is something that they can just skip doing. Obviously part of that 20% is are just dead accounts but still, something to show next time you&#x27;re in this situation.
评论 #13736529 未加载
评论 #13737285 未加载
评论 #13737687 未加载
akjetmaabout 8 years ago
&gt; As the longtime manager put it: “When I look at LivingSocial’s legacy, more than anything else, we basically gave a lot of people their MBAs in scaling a company very fast.”<p>Oh nice, the people at the company that grew too quickly learned how to do it again. Tight.
评论 #13739595 未加载
评论 #13739737 未加载
评论 #13739596 未加载
coldcodeabout 8 years ago
They raised a billion dollars, were valued at one time at 6 billion, and in the end were worth $0. Their lasting impact is other smaller startups who might or might not ever become anything. What a strange world we live in.
mathattackabout 8 years ago
The key takeaway I&#x27;ve got is that sometimes it&#x27;s hard to see when you&#x27;re inside the fad.<p>Interesting that the VC (Jeremy Liew) is the also behind Snapchat. You win some, you lose some, and in Venture investing, the wins take care of the losses.
评论 #13737820 未加载
pmiller2about 8 years ago
What does a $0 acquisition even mean? What would the purpose be?
评论 #13736559 未加载
Exumaabout 8 years ago
What allowed Groupon to survive in this same market (where deals are a waning fashion)?
free2rhyme214about 8 years ago
If I understanding this correct - Groupon is now a monopoly?
评论 #13737889 未加载
评论 #13738010 未加载
评论 #13739361 未加载
socrates1998about 8 years ago
How is Groupon doing?
Animatsabout 8 years ago
How long does Groupon have left?