How exactly is this Web 3.0? I never even really made sense of how you could call Web 2.0 "Web 2.0" when a) almost everyone who develops web 2.0 rich applications only create banners with gigantic, multicolored texts (eg. tutorials "How to make a fancy Web2.0 Logo) and b)This site uses the same technologies as web2.0 in the same ways as I've seen in other places.<p>We need to stop playing this game of semantics, and stop being so anxious to evolve without the real need to.
This reminds me very much of the irritating adverts that highlight specific words it knows about and pops up adverts related to them :/<p>Completely unconvinced...
interesting. it show entities, but does it show relationships? I kind of see that in actions, but it reminds me a lot of grammar class. That's not bad though, as the semantic web is going to have a lot of those fundamentals. Very cool stuff overall.
I think people simply have a habit of categorizing things to make them easier to understand and easier to remember. We associate many things with eras, generations, periods, dynasties, etc.<p>The web is always evolving; it's just easier to consider a particular time frame 'Web 1.0' and the next 'Web 2.0'. From my viewpoint, it seems as if each 'Web x.0' will/would occur after each recessionary cycle.<p>Then again, why try to make sense of something like this that is still so new?
If entities were ever to become something big in the web, it isn't going to be by generating random links between entities and hoping that something useful comes out of it.<p>If anything, someone has to see a useful link between 2 entities and build an application around it. I doubt it will ever happen the other way around.