The 1000 most-visited sites on the web (by Google)

I extracted the data, added IP, country and response headers, and dumped it into a usable format:<p><a href="http://openmymind.net/top1000data.txt" rel="nofollow">http://openmymind.net/top1000data.txt</a><p>You can do some decently interesting analysis..like the fact that nginx is the front-end for nearly as many sites as IIS.

They must have filtered porn. There is no way redtube.com is not in the top 100.

Source: <a href="http://www.google.com/adplanner/static/top1000/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/adplanner/static/top1000/</a>

Amazing that Facebook has <i>ONE THOUSAND</i> pageviews per unique visitor compared to about 100 pageviews per unique visitor on the rest of the sites.

# 824 stackoverflow vs # 994 expertsexchange<p>Perhaps another confirmation of what the SO folks have been saying about their popularity.

#20 - ask.com #252 - digg.com #261 - justin.tv<p>Reddit not in the list... What I don't understand is how come sites like openoffice.org, kaspersky.com, mcafee.com are so high in the list. Do people really visit them that often?

Anyone care to do a scatterplot of domain name length vs rank?

Depressingly, Mahalo is on the list (#946).

Dropbox on the list at 985. Impressive.

Did you guys notice Wordpress.com and .org in there:<p>.com: 120,000,000 uniques<p>.org: 8,100,000 uniques<p>Impressive.

Keep in mind that the numbers listed are estimations.<p>For example, HubPages, the site where I work, is listed at #270 with 11M unique visitors and 97M page views.<p>Our monthly absolute unique visitors (according to Google Analytics) is more than three times that. Our monthly page views are greater than 100M.

"...as measured by Ad Planner."<p>the list is a decent guesstimate. unless every single site on the planet uses the facebook like button, google analytics, google ads, or something else that tracks globally, there is now way to correctly measure UC or PI.

it reassures me that foxnews.com is farther down than I would have expected.<p>43. <a href="http://bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://bbc.co.uk</a> 83. <a href="http://nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://nytimes.com</a> 179. <a href="http://reuters.com" rel="nofollow">http://reuters.com</a> 257. <a href="http://foxsports.com" rel="nofollow">http://foxsports.com</a> 279. <a href="http://foxnews.com" rel="nofollow">http://foxnews.com</a>

Mashable - #696 Techcrunch - #850. Nice to see I'm not the only one that prefers Cashmore to Arrington.

I really doubt that usgs.gov (#978) gets anywhere near the number of visits that nfl.com gets (#993).

Wow, yahoo is up there. It's a shame they can't monetize their websites more.

Geocities still running in Japan after being shut down in the west? Wierd!

It's interesting how hard it is to come up with <a href="http://windows.com" rel="nofollow">http://windows.com</a> even though I tried explicitly searching for it

where s youtube?

where is google in that list ?

the daily mail at 236 aarrgghhhhh!!!!!!!

Scribd 102. Excellent. I would like to know how much financing each one of those site took to date.

google isn't on that list?

where is slashdot?